edit
IndependentProject
Independent Project
[[[TODO]]] [[[Biblio]]] [[Commands]] - These are some commands that I would like to be able to support. (ideally) [[[Working Commands]]] [[[OutputFormat]]] [[[DatabaseStructure]]] [[[TypingSystem]]] [[[Matching]]] [[[SPARQL query manipulation]]] [[[InsertInto]]] [[[Interviews]]] [[[Context]]] [[[Intelligence]]] [[[DynamicLanguageGeneration]]] [[[HTML Output]]] [[[Notes]]] Create/Design a system/interface which can translate strings of text into queries and operations for execution. Features: * clustering of operations for context based on personal history * clustering to determine what kind of transformations do not change meaning. (also use for guessing undefined commands) * clustering to determine what words go in similar places. * clustering to show information you will probably ask. (and provide buttons (with icons?) for others) * use existing/learn new common spelling errors and automatically correct them * translations that leave context clues behind. (need to start dealing with database of some kind, unique identifiers and what format the data should reside in) * leveraging other peoples' history and contexts * consider/avoid problems this could generate from users with a malicious intent * fail proof undo operation * allowing complex manipulation of multiple commands (do x when y) * somehow give names to clusters to avoid ambiguity before it happens. (is this really necessary?) [[[ImplementationDetails]]] Other considerations with shared contexts/translations * sharing just context could be much more secure than translations (although less useful) * what commands could you trust to a system like this? * how useful could a system like this be for sensitive/proprietary applications? * address issues of privacy Issues raised with mixing translations * allowing enough power such that commands can be given to change the way future commands are translated (ex. don't stop playing music unless I explicitly say "stop playing music") * where does this system run into problems such as the above. * how do you reduce these types of problems? * by allowing complex mixing of various commands * again make sure that when the commands are mixed, malicious combinations can not be created. * make sure undo still works Context Clues * how could meta-information about what information has most recently been referred to be stored and accessed? Possible fields of research: * clustering to determine the context of the command and execute the correct one. * ((Collaborative filtering)) - Anyway to avoid robots sending this data? * ((Hierarchical Temporal Memory)) - ??? useful ??? * built in levels of trust where translations provided by untrusted sources can not get access to parts of the system. Not really a whole lot different than the trust systems already in place for open source software. How can the trust which allows apt-get be leveraged to allow new translations?